Posted on 5 November 2009 by David
The strict new pay and expenses regime for MPs announced by Sir Christopher Kelly yesterday has been presented as a necessary, if not sufficient, measure to restore ‘the public’s’ trust and faith in Parliament: as if Parliament were still fundamentally deserving of that trust. However, I’d put it the other way round: the fact that [...]
Filed under: Britain, British parliament, MPs, MPs' expenses, Sir Christopher Kelly, Sir Ian Kennedy, United Kingdom, parliament, politics, respect, trust | Leave a Comment »
Posted on 4 November 2009 by David
So I didn’t call it right: I thought David Cameron would at the very least call a referendum to give a Conservative government the mandate to re-negotiate some of the terms of the UK’s membership of the EU. In the event, today, he merely committed to a pledge that there would be a referendum over [...]
Filed under: Britain, British parliament, Conservative Party, David Cameron, EU, EU constitution, European Union (EU), Lisbon Treaty, UK Sovereignty Bill, UK governance, United Kingdom, constitutional reform, general election, parliament, parliamentary sovereignty, politics, popular sovereignty, referendum, referendum lock, sovereignty | Leave a Comment »
Posted on 27 October 2009 by David
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not a BNP supporter. I despise their racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia. However, I agree with some of their key policies: restrictions to immigration, withdrawal of the UK from the EU, withdrawal of British troops from Afghanistan, and more accountable local and regional democracy. Yes, those last two items [...]
Filed under: Afghanistan, BBC, Britain, British National Party (BNP), British parliament, Conservative Party, David Cameron, EU constitution, England, English Parliament, European Parliament, European Union (EU), First Past the Post, Gordon Brown, Liberal Democrats, Lisbon Treaty, New Labour, Nick Griffin, Question Time, Real Change, United Kingdom, constitutional convention, constitutional reform, hung parliament, immigration, parliament, politics, proportional representation, racism, sovereignty | 2 Comments »
Posted on 5 October 2009 by David
A truly comical row has broken out over SNP leader Alex Salmond’s insistence that he should participate in any debate between the party leaders broadcast in Scotland ahead of the next general election. The three main parties are insisting that as Salmond isn’t even standing for parliament – and therefore, by definition, is not a [...]
Filed under: Alex Salmond, Britain, British parliament, England, English democratic deficit, English social policy, SNP, Scotland, United Kingdom, democracy, devolution, devolved matters, general election, leaders' debate, nationalism, parliament, politics, reserved matters | 3 Comments »
Posted on 26 September 2009 by David
Watched the TV interview with the English Democrat chairman Robin Tilbrook on the Daily Politics yesterday. Effectively, he was given about half of the five minutes allotted to the item, with the remaining half being given over to a couple of panellists. I thought he held his own quite well against some fairly tough questioning. [...]
Filed under: Anita Anand, BBC, Barnett Formula, Britain, British parliament, Daily Politics, England, English Democrats, English NHS, English Parliament, English democratic deficit, English governance, English identity, English nationalism, English nationhood, Englishness, Fraser Nelson, NHS, PR, Radio Four, Robin Tilbrook, Scotland, Scottish Parliament, Today Programme, UK governance, United Kingdom, asymmetric devolution, civic nationalism, constitutional reform, democracy, denial of England, devolution, general election, media bias, national identity, nationalism, nations and regions, parliament, politics, proportional representation, referendum, the English Question, unionism | 4 Comments »
Posted on 28 July 2009 by David
Introduction: Deliberations on British-constitutional reform must factor in the national questions
I recently signed up to ‘Real Change‘. This is a grassroots movement that aims to set in motion a nationwide debate, at local level, about fundamental constitutional reform, culminating ultimately in a citizens’ convention to collate and deliberate on all the options, and to come [...]
Filed under: Britain, British parliament, England, English Grand Committee, English Parliament, English governance, English nationhood, Gordon Brown, MPs, MPs' expenses, New Labour, Real Change, Scottish Claim of Right, Scottish independence, Scottish nationhood, UK governance, United Kingdom, West Lothian Question, asymmetric devolution, constitutional convention, constitutional reform, democracy, denial of England, devolution, national identity, nations and regions, parliament, parliamentary sovereignty, politics, popular sovereignty, representative democracy, republicanism, sovereignty, the English Question, unionism | 3 Comments »
Posted on 19 July 2009 by David
There’s an interesting thread on the Our Kingdom site at the moment about the best tactics for bringing about radical constitutional reform in the UK. Anthony Barnett’s piece detailing seven possible strategies, which kicked off the thread, is especially worth checking out.
I have previously suggested in this blog that one possible tactic would be to [...]
Filed under: David Davies, Diane Abbott, England, English Parliament, Frank Field, MPs, United Kingdom, constitutional reform, democracy, parliament, politics, popular sovereignty, revolution | Leave a Comment »
Posted on 25 June 2009 by David
“Nobody puts new wine in old wineskins; otherwise, the new wine will burst the skins and run to waste, and the skins will be ruined. No; new wine must be put in fresh skins. And nobody who has been drinking old wine wants new. ‘The old is good’, he says”. The Gospel According To St. [...]
Filed under: Britain, British parliament, Chilcot Enquiry, Church of England, England, English Parliament, English governance, Gordon Brown, House of Lords, John Bercow, PR, Parliamentary Standards Authority, United Kingdom, accountability, constitutional convention, constitutional reform, disestablishment, federal UK, federalism, parliament, parliamentary sovereignty, politics, popular sovereignty, proportional representation, sovereignty | Leave a Comment »
Posted on 17 June 2009 by David
The eagerness of the main unionist parties to seize on the Calman Commission’s report on Scottish devolution, published on Monday, suggests how little they are interested in factoring the English Question into their constitutional-renewal programmes. The report offers nothing for England: it deliberately avoids addressing the West Lothian Question; it urges that the Barnett Formula [...]
Filed under: Barnett Formula, British parliament, Calman Commission, Conservative Party, England, English governance, Scotland, Scottish Parliament, United Kingdom, Wales, West Lothian Question, asymmetric devolution, constitutional reform, devolution, parliament, politics, sovereignty, the English Question | Leave a Comment »
Posted on 2 June 2009 by David
Never thought I’d say that! I don’t consider myself to be politically right-wing and I’m certainly not a Unionist; so UKIP is far from being a natural political home for me. I don’t like UKIP’s simplistic, black-and-white presentation of the case against the EU and open immigration policies, even though I myself am in favour [...]
Filed under: Britain, Conservative Party, David Cameron, EU, EU constitution, England, English Parliament, English governance, English nationalism, English pauses for English clauses, European Parliament, First Past the Post, Labour Party, Liberal Democrats, Lisbon Treaty, MPs' expenses, PR, UK governance, United Kingdom, West Lothian Question, constitutional reform, devolution, federal UK, federalism, monarchy, nationalism, parliament, politics, proportional representation, referendum, representative democracy, sovereignty, the English Question, unionism | 9 Comments »